Criteria for the clinical use of intravenous immunoglobulin in Australia
Second Edition Quick Reference Guide
Medical condition | Haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) (Condition for which IVIg use is in exceptional circumstances only) |
---|---|
Indication for IVIg use |
HDN arises from foetomaternal antigen incompatibility and can result in clinically significant foetal/neonatal haemolysis, severe anaemia and hyperbilirubinaemia. Although prophylaxis programs have reduced the frequency of rhesus (Rh) D HDN, antibodies to RhD remain the most common cause in Australia. Antibodies to other antigens in the Rh system (e.g. Rhc, E), ABO and other antigens (e.g. K) may also cause disease ranging from mild to life-threatening. IVIg may be used in selected cases in consultation with experts in foetomaternal medicine and transfusion medicine. Refer to the current product information sheet for further information. The aim should be to use the lowest dose possible that achieves the appropriate clinical outcome for each patient. |
Level of evidence | Small case studies only - Insufficient data (Category 4a) |
Medical condition | Haemolytic transfusion reaction (Condition for which IVIg use is in exceptional circumstances only) |
---|---|
Indication for IVIg use |
IVIg may be considered in the management or prevention of severe haemolytic transfusion reaction not responding to other interventions (e.g. corticosteroids). Refer to the current product information sheet for further information. The aim should be to use the lowest dose possible that achieves the appropriate clinical outcome for each patient. |
Level of evidence | Small case studies only - Insufficient data (Category 4a) |
Medical condition | Haemophagocytic syndrome (Condition for which IVIg has an emerging therapeutic role) |
---|---|
Indication for IVIg use |
Management of severe haemophagocytic syndrome not responding to other treatments. |
Description and diagnostic criteria |
Haemophagocytic syndrome is characterised by fever, splenomegaly, jaundice, rash and the pathologic finding of haemophagocytosis (phagocytosis by macrophages of erythrocytes, leukocytes, platelets and their precursors) in bone marrow and other tissues with peripheral blood cytopenias. Haemophagocytic syndrome has been associated with a wide range of infectious, autoimmune, malignant and other disorders (modified from Fisman 2000). Mortality is high. |
Level of evidence | Small case studies only - Insufficient data (Category 4a) |
Qualifying criteria for IVIg therapy |
Bone marrow diagnosis or other biopsy evidence of haemophagocytosis in the characteristic clinical setting. Note: Since other therapies (cytotoxic agents) have major potential side effects, optimal therapy is not yet defined. |
Review criteria for assessing the effectiveness of IVIg use |
|
Dose |
2 g/kg is the most widely published dose. Emmenegger et al (2001) reported that better outcomes were associated with early administration of IVIg in their small case series (10 patients). Dosing above 1 g/kg per day is contraindicated for some IVIg products. Refer to the current product information sheet for further information. The aim should be to use the lowest dose possible that achieves the appropriate clinical outcome for each patient. |
Medical condition | Hashimoto Encephalopathy (Condition for which IVIg use is in exceptional circumstances only) |
---|---|
Indication for IVIg use |
IVIg is not supported as a first-line treatment, because preferable alternative treatments are available. IVIg may be considered in exceptional circumstances where there is progressive neurologic decline despite appropriate steroid therapy. Refer to the current product information sheet for further information. The aim should be to use the lowest dose possible that achieves the appropriate clinical outcome for each patient. |
Level of evidence | Small case studies only - Insufficient data (Category 4a) |
Medical condition | HIV in children (Condition for which IVIg use is in exceptional circumstances only) |
---|---|
Indication for IVIg use |
The need for IVIg in paediatric HIV has been substantially reduced with the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). A trial of therapy may however be considered in children with significant recurrent bacterial infections despite HAART. Refer to the current product information sheet for further information. The aim should be to use the lowest dose possible that achieves the appropriate clinical outcome for each patient. |
Level of evidence | Evidence of probable benefit (Category 2a) |
Medical condition | Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) — adult (Condition for which IVIg use has an established therapeutic role) |
---|---|
Indication for IVIg use |
1. Refractory acute ITP on the recommendation of a clinical haematologist Patients with severe thrombocytopenia (platelets <30×109/L) who have not responded to corticosteroid therapy. 2. ITP with life-threatening haemorrhage or the potential for life-threatening haemorrhage Patients with severe thrombocytopenia (<30×109/L) with clinical evidence of a haemostatic defect (e.g. mucous membrane haemorrhage) or active bleeding. 3. ITP in pregnancy
4. Specific circumstances
5. HIV–associated ITP Patients with severe ITP associated with HIV infection. |
Level of evidence | Evidence of probable benefit (Category 2a) |
Description and diagnostic criteria |
ITP is a reduction in platelet count (thrombocytopenia) resulting from shortened platelet survival due to anti-platelet antibodies. When counts are very low (<30×109/L), bleeding into the skin (purpura) and mucous membranes can occur. Bone marrow platelet production (megakaryopoiesis) is morphologically normal. In some cases, there is additional impairment of platelet function related to antibody binding to glycoproteins on the platelet surface. ITP is divided into chronic and acute forms. It is a common finding in patients with HIV, and while it may be found at any stage of the infection, its prevalence increases as HIV disease advances. Around 80% of adults with ITP have the chronic form of disease. The highest incidence of chronic ITP is in women aged 15–50 years, although some reports suggest increasing incidence with age. Chronic ITP may relapse and remit spontaneously and the course may be difficult to predict. If the platelet count can be maintained at a level that prevents spontaneous bleeding or bruising, the outlook is good. |
Qualifying criteria for IVIg therapy |
1. Refractory acute ITP:
2. ITP with life-threatening haemorrhage or the potential for life-threatening haemorrhage: IVIg therapy may be given when conventional doses of corticosteroids have failed or in conjunction with steroids when a rapid response is required. 3. ITP in pregnancy:
4. Specific circumstances:
5. HIV-associated ITP:
OR
|
Review criteria for assessing the effectiveness of IVIg use |
|
Dose |
Initial therapy: 1–2 g/kg as a single or divided dose. Ongoing therapy: When indicated, 1–2 g/kg in single or divided dose at 4 to 6 weekly intervals titrated to symptoms and platelet count. Dosing above 1 g/kg per day is contraindicated for some IVIg products. Refer to the current product information sheet for further information. The aim should be to use the lowest dose possible that achieves the appropriate clinical outcome for each patient. |
Medical condition | Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) – children 15 years and younger (Condition for which IVIg has an emerging therapeutic role) |
---|---|
Indication for IVIg use | ITP with platelet count <30×109/L with significant bleeding. |
Level of evidence | Clear evidence of benefit (Category 1) |
Description and diagnostic criteria |
ITP is a reduction in platelet count (thrombocytopenia) resulting from shortened platelet survival due to anti-platelet antibodies. When counts are very low (<30×109/L) bleeding into the skin (purpura) and mucous membranes can occur. Bone marrow morphology is normal. In some cases, there is additional impairment of platelet function related to antibody binding to glycoproteins on the platelet surface. ITP is divided into chronic and acute forms. In children, the acute form is the most common. The disease tends to present abruptly with dramatic evidence of bleeding into the skin (petechiae and purpura) and mucous membranes (gum bleeding, nose bleeds, blood blisters). Occurrence Girls and boys are affected equally. In 75% of patients, the episode follows vaccination or a viral infection such as varicella or infectious mononucleosis. Prognosis At least 80–90% of children will have spontaneous remission of their disease within 6–12 months. In 5–10% of cases, the disease may become chronic (lasting >6 months). Morbidity and mortality from acute ITP is very low. |
Qualifying criteria for IVIg therapy |
Note: While the effectiveness of IVIg is not disputed, clinical experts advise that most children with ITP do not require IVIg therapy; indeed, no treatment at all is required for many children. Corticosteroids are the alternative therapy to IVIg. Acute ITP
OR
Chronic ITP
OR
OR
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Review criteria for assessing the effectiveness of IVIg use |
|
Dose |
Acute ITP Life-threatening bleeding: up to 2 g/kg total dose, generally given as 2 doses of 1 g/kg. Other indications: 0.5 g/kg given as a single dose, repeated at 24–48 hours if the response is inadequate. A higher total dose of 2 g/kg may be required in 5–10% of cases. Duration of response to initial dose is typically two to four weeks. A repeat dose may be considered if recurrent symptomatic thrombocytopenia occurs. Chronic ITP Life-threatening bleeding: up to 2 g/kg total dose, generally given as 2 doses of 1 g/kg. Other indications: 0.5 to 1 g/kg at intervals generally > three weekly. Dosing above 1 g/kg per day is contraindicated for some IVIg products. Refer to the current product information sheet for further information. The aim should be to use the lowest dose possible that achieves the appropriate clinical outcome for each patient. |
Medical condition | IgM paraproteinaemic neuropathy (Condition for which IVIg has an emerging therapeutic role) |
---|---|
Indication for IVIg use |
Patients with IgM paraproteinaemic neuropathy with functional impairment in whom other therapies have failed or are contraindicated or undesirable. |
Level of evidence | Conflicting evidence of benefit (Category 2c) |
Description and diagnostic criteria |
IgM paraproteinaemic neuropathy is a slowly progressive, predominantly sensory neuropathy that may eventually produce disabling motor symptoms. The condition is associated with IgM paraprotein, which is a monoclonal antibody to myelin associated glycoprotein (MAG). IgM paraproteinaemic neuropathy is the most common subgroup of the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) group. It is distinguishable from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) by:
Nerve conduction studies usually show uniform symmetrical conduction slowing with prolonged distal latencies and distal attenuation (distal index is prolonged). Test for antibodies to neural antigens (MAG or other neural antigens) may be helpful. |
Qualifying criteria for IVIg therapy |
Diagnosis by a neurologist of IgM paraproteinaemic neuropathy with:
AND
|
Review criteria for assessing the effectiveness of IVIg use |
IVIg should be used for three to six months (three to six courses) before determining whether the patient has responded. If there is no benefit after three to six courses, IVIg therapy should be abandoned. Review Regular review by neurologist is required; frequency as determined by clinical status of patient. For stable patients on maintenance treatment review by a neurologist is required at least annually. Effectiveness Clinical documentation of effectiveness is necessary for continuation of IVIg therapy. Effectiveness can be demonstrated by objective findings of either:
|
Dose |
Induction: 2 g/kg in 2–5 divided doses. Maintenance: 0.4–1 g/kg, 2 to 6 weekly. Maintenance treatment only with clear, objective improvement. Aim for minimum dose to maintain optimal functional status. Refer to the current product information sheet for further information. The aim should be to use the lowest dose possible that achieves the appropriate clinical outcome for each patient. |
Medical condition | Inflammatory myopathies (Condition for which IVIg use has an established therapeutic role) |
---|---|
Indication for IVIg use |
|
Level of evidence | Evidence of probable benefit (Category 2a) |
Description and diagnostic criteria |
The inflammatory myopathies are a group of three discrete disorders of skeletal muscle: DM, PM and IBM. These disorders are acquired and have in common the occurrence of significant muscle weakness and the presence of an inflammatory response within the muscle. The diagnosis of DM, PM or IBM is usually made by neurologists or rheumatologists, and relies on the combination of careful clinical evaluation, an elevated creatine kinase level, electromyography and muscle biopsy. |
Qualifying criteria for IVIg therapy |
Diagnosis made by a neurologist, rheumatologist or immunologist of:
OR
OR
|
Exclusion criteria for IVIg therapy |
Expert consensus does not recommend IVIg to treat the limb weakness of IBM. |
Review criteria for assessing the effectiveness of IVIg use |
IVIg should be used for three to six months (three to six courses) before determining whether the patient has responded. If there is no benefit after three to six courses, IVIg therapy should be abandoned. Review Regular review by a neurologist, rheumatologist, or clinical immunologist is required; frequency as determined by clinical status of patient. For stable patients on maintenance treatment, review by a specialist is required at least annually. Effectiveness Clinical documentation of effectiveness is necessary for continuation of IVIg therapy. Effectiveness can be demonstrated by objective findings of either:
OR
|
Dose |
Induction: 2 g/kg in 2 to 5 divided doses. Maintenance: 0.4–1 g/kg, 4–6 weekly. Aim for the minimum dose to maintain optimal functional status. Dosing above 1 g/kg per day is contraindicated for some IVIg products. Refer to the current product information sheet for further information. The aim should be to use the lowest dose possible that achieves the appropriate clinical outcome for each patient. |