The National Blood Authority senior executive management team comprises the following staff:
Brief biographies of these staff are given in Appendix 8.
Three formal governance committees—the Senior Executive Managers’ Committee, the Executive Managers’ Committee and the Audit Committee—help the NBA executive plan and manage core strategic projects and stakeholder concerns. See Appendix 9 for further details.
The committees are actively involved in:
In addition, the NBA has two formal cross-team functional committees to provide opportunities for staff to discuss strategies, issues, and processes and share experiences on issues of common relevance. These cross-team functional committees are a key element in our internal knowledge network, ensuring that work priorities and models relating to demand forecasting and supply coordination are effectively linked and that data and systems development activities are prioritised to best meet internal and external priorities.
The Audit Committee’s work program progressed well during 2010–11. Activities included:
The committee met six times in 2010–11.
The NBA’s internal audit program, guided by the Audit Committee, plays a key part in ensuring that risk is managed appropriately.
A review of the NBA’s policies and procedures for the verification of goods ordering and receipting was completed in November 2010. The NBA is now implementing key recommendations, including ensuring a more comprehensive accountability framework for contracts.
The internal auditor conducted a review of the IDMS including an assessment of risks, evaluation of controls, assessment of security, interfaces with other business systems and a general review of the performance of the system.
The review confirmed the system’s functionality and its appropriateness as a platform for further development of NBA information and data strategies. A number of recommendations were made and the NBA is undertaking further analysis of several technical issues and refining how the system interacts with our business processes.
The NBA’s governance framework integrates risk management considerations into all of its planning activities, including:
The NBA’s strategic risk management plan for 2011–12 was drafted. The plan identifies six key risks that could impact on the ability of the NBA to deliver a safe and secure blood supply.
Both the NBA Board and the Audit Committee provided input into the draft plan which is expected to be finalised in August 2011.
The NBA participated in the 2011 Comcover Risk Management Benchmarking Survey and received a benchmarking score of 7.2 out of a possible 10. This benchmarking score places the NBA at a ‘structured’ maturity level. The average score achieved by all participating agencies was 6.4 out of 10. The survey identified the areas of greatest strength for the NBA’s risk management capabilities including risk management policy and objectives, integration and accountability and responsibility. The NBA will strive for further improvement by focusing on risk assessment, risk profiling and resourcing.
The Commonwealth Fraud Control Guidelines require agencies to conduct a fraud risk assessment and develop a fraud control plan every two years. The existing NBA fraud control plan expired in late 2010. KPMG was appointed to undertake the fraud risk assessment and develop a fraud control plan for 2010–12.
The findings of the 2010 fraud risk assessment indicated that there were no significant risks to the NBA, with a universally strong control environment in operation. No significant gaps were identified in the NBA’s fraud controls.
However, the Audit Committee did note that there were two moderate fraud risks. In response to these, the NBA is reviewing improved control measures.
Under its current plan, the NBA continually monitors accountability and control frameworks to meet the specific needs of the agency, and ensures that it complies with the Commonwealth Fraud Control Guidelines.
No instances of fraud were detected during the reporting year.
The NBA acknowledges the assistance provided by its external auditors, the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO), in 2010–11. This assistance enabled the NBA to ensure compliance and appropriate accountability and to identify scope for continual improvement in our activities.
The ANAO continued its performance audit of NBA activities. The objective of the 2010–11 audit is to assess whether the NBA’s governance and contractual arrangements are effective in ensuring sufficient blood supply and services. The ANAO has undertaken field work to examine whether the NBA demonstrates:
Finalisation of the audit is expected in the latter half of 2011.
There were no judicial decisions or decisions of administrative tribunals that impacted on the operations of the NBA during 2010–11. There were no reports of the agency by a Parliamentary committee or the Commonwealth Ombudsman.